Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(2026 is off to a great start, isn’t it? Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

    • Trottelreiner@rollenspiel.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      @Soyweiser Well, If you subscribe to the Simulation hypothesis, who’s to say the Matrix has no glitches, e.g. writing data to the wrong string, err, telepathy or clairvoyance.
      Whatever, the TESCREAL crowd going even deeper into woo wouldn’t surprise me.

      • Charlie Stross@wandering.shop
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        @trottelreiner @Soyweiser @techtakes A chunk of it goes back to Madame Blavatsky and the Theosophist movement. Who overlapped time/location-wise with Nikolai Feodorovitch Feodorov, the theologian behind Cosmism.

        It’s Christian heresies all the way down, once you dig past the computer-toucher fertilized topsoil.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        who’s to say the Matrix has no glitches

        The simulation theorists actually. It isn’t really a coherent theory, more an idea that the arguments change for depending on what they have to defend, at least in my exp. (See also my rants about how the whole ‘ancestor simulation’ theory undermines the whole simulation idea).

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        He is a true believer in what we now call TESCREAL. I wish there was a good copy of all the H+ magazines (esp the bit where they rebranded as a blog, I know the first few actual articles are on the internet archive as pdfs), because I want to say that the most far out articles written in that were often by him, but that isn’t a thing I can say just of the top of my head without anything to back it up. (The magazine was weird articles that went from ‘look at this cool new tech, and all the things that might be possible’ to ‘here is something that is so out there that it took a lot of weed to make’.