Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(2026 is off to a great start, isn’t it? Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)
@Soyweiser Well, If you subscribe to the Simulation hypothesis, who’s to say the Matrix has no glitches, e.g. writing data to the wrong string, err, telepathy or clairvoyance.
Whatever, the TESCREAL crowd going even deeper into woo wouldn’t surprise me.
@trottelreiner @Soyweiser @techtakes A chunk of it goes back to Madame Blavatsky and the Theosophist movement. Who overlapped time/location-wise with Nikolai Feodorovitch Feodorov, the theologian behind Cosmism.
It’s Christian heresies all the way down, once you dig past the computer-toucher fertilized topsoil.
@cstross @trottelreiner @Soyweiser @techtakes And I regard Christianity itself as a heresy from Judaism. I suspect it’s an inevitability with monotheism
@bellinghman @cstross @Soyweiser @techtakes Well, Western thought basically boils down to footnotes for Platon[1] for some. Though Charlie mentioning our favourite pothead Blavatsky makes me go down a indology-related rabbit hole, and I’m at work, so maybe later.
[1] And maybe some branches of not so Western thought. Sanskrit prof mused about Shankara influencing Platon, given the chronology, neoplatonism influencing Shankara seems more likely. But then, buddhism influenced Greeks…
The simulation theorists actually. It isn’t really a coherent theory, more an idea that the arguments change for depending on what they have to defend, at least in my exp. (See also my rants about how the whole ‘ancestor simulation’ theory undermines the whole simulation idea).