Say you’re just someone who does stuff and it’s on the computer. Wouldn’t it be good if you could automate some of the stuff? Sounds useful! You do some web design, but you’re not much of a coder. …
  • CynAq🤘@beige.party
    5·
    1 day ago

    @dgerard @cstross JFC… I expected to read something like “you should’ve ran it in a sandbox” regarding the victim blaming, but “you prompted it wrong”??! J double FC!

    • swlabr@awful.systemsEnglish
      6·
      1 day ago

      Lol, honestly, that’s on you for having incorrectly adjusted priors. Whenever I catch wind of a prompting snafu, I immediately assume I’ll hear the rejoinder of “You must be prompting it wrong”.

  • J$@mastodon.nl
    4·
    1 day ago

    @dgerard That’s just your vibe wipin’
    You’re telling me lies, yeah
    Vibe wipin’, you wear a disguise
    Vibr wipin’, so misunderstood, yeah
    Vibe wipin’, you’re really no good

  • Bappity@lemmy.worldEnglish
    6·
    2 days ago

    trusting an AI glorified autocomplete to do anything with your file system was your first mistake

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsEnglish
    6·
    2 days ago

    To (somewhat) reiterate a potentially extreme position of mine, shit like this is why society needs to actively avoid adopting new software for the time being, if not actively cut back on software usage whenever possible.

    Whilst the IT industry was already a failure-ridden mess which actively refuses to learn before AI was a thing, the rise of AI and “vibe coding” has made things so much worse in practically every regard. At this point, any new software should be treated as a liability until proven otherwise.

    • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      7·
      2 days ago

      while I relate to this take and it could even work out for offline systems, online systems need constant updates to protect yourself against software vulnerabilities. i don’t think we’ve reached the point where FOSS software is so infiltrated that a Trojan would be less malicious than slop code