Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(December’s finally arrived, and the run-up to Christmas has begun. Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      hi hi I am budweiser jabrony please join my new famous and good website ‘tapering incorrectness dot com’ where we speculate about which OSI layers have the most consciousness (zero is not a valid amount of consciousness) also give money and prima nocta. thanks

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Tcp/ip knew what it did, with its authoritarian desire to see packets in order. Reject authority embrace UDP!

      But yes, they are using ‘layer’ wrong

      • bitofhope@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well that and “core”. I could consider social media and even chatbots parts of internet infrastructure, but they both depend on a framework of underlying protocols and their implementation details. Without social media or chatbots the internet would still be the internet, which is not the case for, say, the Internet Protocol.

        • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Also I would contend they’re misusing “infrastructure”. Social media and chat bots are kinds of services that are provided over the internet, but they aren’t a part of the infrastructure itself anymore than the world’s largest ball of twine is part of the infrastructure of the Interstate Highway System.

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Heh yeah, “infrastructure” in the same way that moneyed bayfuckers are “builders”

            It is also a useful study in just how little they fucking by get about how anything works, and what models of reasoning they apply to what they perceive. Depressing, but useful