

No. I meant exactly the link I picked. It’s not about the contents of the movie or the documentary. It is about the title.


No. I meant exactly the link I picked. It’s not about the contents of the movie or the documentary. It is about the title.


That’s not what I said.
What I said was I found the fact that the documentary (the first I am hearing about, by the way) has the same name as a movie that already exists and that’s confusing.
I don’t know why this is hard to understand. If the documentary was named “The Art of the Deal” would that not be a little confusing? Maybe even a little off putting?


Pretty sure I do not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Machine_(1993_film)


No, actually. I don’t.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Machine_(1993_film)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Machine_(1993_film)
I mean Ghost in the Machine, a movie from 1993 about a serial killer who gets struck by lightening and somehow ends up digitized and uses a digital scan of a woman’s planner to stalk her and her son and attempt to kill them.


Yeah, I don’t like that. Naming your documentary the same name as a movie from the early 90’s is a choice. A confusing choice.


Ew. What? No. Fuuuuuck no.
You’re being a dick. And a troll so far as I can tell.